4G or static residential proxy for ad profiles — which one has had fewer bans?
Mariana Lopes · 2026-10-07
Context
In today’s paid ads landscape, choosing the right type of proxy to manage ad profiles is crucial. Using suitable proxies can directly impact ad approval rates and account security. 4G proxies, which use mobile networks, and static residential proxies, which simulate fixed connections, each have their pros and cons. The question is: which one has been associated with fewer bans?
What i tested
I tested both types of proxies across different campaigns over a three-month period. Here are the results:
- 4G Proxy:
- Ban rate: 15% of the ads were rejected.
- Speed: Average of 50 Mbps, with acceptable latency.
- Advantage: Dynamic IP changes, providing greater privacy.
- Static Residential Proxy:
- Ban rate: 8% of the ads were rejected.
- Speed: Average of 100 Mbps, with low latency.
- Advantage: A fixed IP that looks more legitimate to the platforms.
Based on these numbers, it’s clear that the static residential proxy performed better in terms of bans, even though it costs 30% more on average.
Question
Given the performance differences, which proxy have you been using in your campaigns, and what ban rate have you seen?
Asking for country-specific experience
I’d also like to know how this experience varies by country. Have you noticed significant differences in ban rates between 4G and static residential proxies in regions like Brazil, Europe, or the US? Share your results!
Criteria
For a more accurate analysis, consider the following criteria when choosing your proxy:
- Cost: Compare the price of each proxy type and calculate the return on investment.
- Ban Rate: Keep track of ad approval rates for each proxy.
- Speed: Test connection speed and latency to ensure optimal campaign performance.
- Support: Check the quality of technical support offered by the proxy provider.
This data can help the community make more informed decisions when choosing proxies.
Which type of proxy do you prefer, and what ban rate have you been seeing?